User:Ariella

Funerary Temple

Tiles Used:

      26 Alice Blue
      49 Black
     275 Dark Cyan
     351 Dark Green
     343 Dark Orchid
      47 Dark Slate Blue
       2 Dark Slate Gray
     343 Ghost White
     343 Golden Rod
       3 Honey Dew
     343 Lavender
     343 Light Blue
     343 Light Golden Rod Yellow
     343 Light Green
     343 Light Pink
     343 Light Slate Gray
     343 Light Steel Blue
       2 Maroon
     343 Medium Orchid
     343 Medium Sea Green
     343 Medium Turquoise
     189 Midnight Blue
      88 Mint Cream
     343 Moccasin
     343 Orchid
     343 Pale Green
     343 Pink
     418 Plum
      46 Powder Blue
     343 Sea Shell
     343 Silver
     349 Sky Blue
       6 Snow
     343 Steel Blue
     384 Teal
     394 Thistle
     343 Tomato
     343 White
     345 White Smoke

Flax Solvent data

Ariella#5 NG/OE 3 0 1 2 1 (Cross #17-20 3 flax genes on left)

• expected length 32-34
• ORGR OYGR RRRG GYRK YGYG RYRR ROYG RRGG RRYO GYOR YOOY YGRR RGRG GYGY RGYG RGGR KORG YRRR YGYO
• genome: KORGRGYGYGY|G|YORYRRRGGROYGRRYOOYGYRK, length 33

Default 5 weeds - 2 weeds(2 OR) and -2 weeds(3 Flax) Default -1 water +3 water(3 Flax) GYGYGYGY = 3 flax

Ariella#8 OE/NG 2 1 1 2 0 (Cross #17-20 rotten genes on right)

• expected length 32-34
• RYYO OYYO RRGY GYOR 2YYRG 2GYGY ORRK RGYO ORYY ORRG RGYG KRYY YOGY 2GRGY OGYG
• genome: KRYYOGYGYO|R|R|GYGYGYGRGYORYYRGROYYORRK, length 34 (R added) (if old theory is correct, this would be 3 flax, so the shortened genome is probably the right one)
• or genome: KRYYOGYGYORR|GYGYGRGYORYYRGROYYORRK, length 32 (gene dropped)
• other combos would be too long or too short (presuming baby is average length with gene added or dropped)
• flax: 2(GYGY)
• rotten flax: 1(RRGY)
• seeds: 1(RO)
• weeds: 5(default) - 3(OR) - 1(2 flax - 1) = 1 BUT WE HAVE 2
  • me might conclude: weeds is not dimished by (# flax -1) but by (# of GYGYGY strings) resulting in 5 - 3 - 0 = 2
• water: -1(default) + 2(flax) - 0(ROGY) = 1 BUT WE HAVE 0
  • we might conclude: hard to tell yet, could be add of(# of GYGYGY strings) so that GYGYGY converts a weed to water resulting in -1 + 0 = -1 thus 0; also would explain why high flax producers still can have 0 water like seen in Tale 3; would put the ROGY which was uncertain still in big doubt

Tedra #297 4 3 6 1 0 Flax/Rotten/Seeds/Weed/Water

7GYRR 5YGYY ROGY 5GYGY 6YROK 4OROY RRRG 3YRRG OROR YORR 2GYOR 2ROYR 4RORO 2RGYG 3RRGY YRRR OROO 4YGYR ORRG 2KRRO YGYG 2GYYG 3OORO 3OGYG 2RGYR 2YGYO RROG Need ROO?(probably R) OYR?(probably O or R ?YRO(probably G or O) ?OOR(probably R) YYG?(expecting Y)

• genome: KRROGYGY G|R|Y ... RG|YG|RO YROK

  R|Y GYRR G|R
  O|R|Y GYGYYG YY|YR|YG|YO
  O|R OROYR OK|RG|RR
  R|Y GYRRRGY G|R
  O|R ORORO O|R|Y
  O|R|Y GYGYORRGY G|R
  O|R|Y RRGYGY G|R|Y
  O|R OROO RO O|R|Y
  O|R OR OORO O|R|Y
  O|Y|R GYGYRR G|R
  O|R|Y GYGYGY G|R|Y

                            RGYG
                             GYGY
                              YGYG
KRRO                           GYGY
 RROG          RGYR             YGYR
  ROGY           YRRR            GYRR
   OGYG           RRRG            YRRG     OROO
    GYGY
     YGYO          RRGY            RRGY      OORO
      GYOR                 YGYY               OROR        
       YORR                 GYYG               RORO
        ORRG                                    OROY       
         RRGY                                    ROYR         
          RGYG or RGYR                             YROK
                                                                 

• the OK at end indicates there has been a full left part taken once in ascendents, since NE and NG do not have OK at end, unless 2 genes of NG were dropped in history (a conclusion that helps us no further)
• we expect: 4 GYGY, 3 RRGY, 6 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Tedra #253 5 2 6 0 1 Flax/Rotten/Seeds/Weed/Water

2OROR 2YGYG ORRG RRRR GYOR 4GYGY RRGY 2RORO 2GYYG KRRO ROGY RRRO YGYY

• genome: KRRO... (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

      OROR
            YGYG
        ORRG
              RRRR
           GYOR
           GYGY
         RRGY
     RORO
           GYYG
   KRRO
                 ROGY
               RRRO
             YGYY

• we expect: 5 GYGY, 2 RRGY, 6 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), at least 5 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, minimum 2 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Tedra #246 3 3 7 1 0

ORRG 3YORR 2ORRG RGYR RGYG OROY YRRG 4RORO RROG RRGY YGYR KRRO RRRO RROO

• genome: KRRO... (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

   KRRO
    RROG

• we expect: 3 GYGY, 3 RRGY, 7 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Zaniac #390 4 2 5 1 0

2YRGY 3YOGY 5YRRG 5RORO 2GYRG 2YROK 5GYGY 6GYRR 2OGYG 3YGYY RYYO 2ORRG 3RRGY OROY RROR 3OROR YGYG 2RGYR RGYG YGYO YORR ROYR 3YGYR KRYY 2GYOR OYRO YYOG Need GYY?(O expected) ?RRO(O or Y expected)

• genome: KRYYOGYGY ... ROROYROK (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

  R|Y GYRGY G|R
  KRYYOGYGY G|O|R|Y
  R|Y GYRRGY G|R
  O|R RORO R|Y
  O|R ROROYROK
  O|R|Y GYGYY OGYGY G|O|R|Y
  O|R|Y GYGYORRGY G|R
  O|Y RRGY G|R
  GY|YO RRORO R|Y
  O|R RORORO R|Y
  O|R|Y GYGYGY G|O|R|Y
  R|Y RGYR G|R
  R|Y RGYGY G|O|R|Y
  O|R|Y GYGYR G|R
  
  

KRYY           YRGY              RROR       RORO
 RYYO           RGYR or RGYG                 OROY
  YYOG                                        ROYR
   YOGY                                        OYRO
    OGYG                                        YROK

• we expect: 4 GYGY, 2 RRGY, 5 RO (3 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (2 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Expectations when elongating OE and shortening NG

• OE elongations (RYYOG YGYOR RYORY OGYOR YRRRG GROYG RRYOO YGYR)
  • duplicated genes without effect: all except 6 and 7
  • duplicated genes that cause 0 flax: 6, 7
    • this is BAD NEWS (would cost a fortune in solvents to study each and every cross result), so might be better to get full genome of a more proficient seed that is pretty long, and have elongations often show in characteristics

• NG shortening (ORGRG YGYGY GRGYO RYYRG ROYYO RR)
  • lost genes without effect:
  • lost gene causing FATAL seed loss: 21 and 22
  • flax (and probably watering) less: 4,5,6,7,8,9
  • extra weed: 1, 2, 15, 16, 25, 26
  • rotten flax add: 3
    • estimate 1/6 * 13/27 of the non-fatal crosses show a difference that COULD indicate shortening, some changes can indicate lengthening, therefore we'll look at what lengthening could cause:
      • add rotten flax (2 chances), flax (and probably watering) less (4 chances); meaning some same type of effects
    • estimate of crosses that show a difference (fatal seed loss included): 1/6 (9/27 + 13/27) = 13.6%