User:Ariella

Funerary Temple

Tiles Used:

      26 Alice Blue
      49 Black
       8 Dark Green
      47 Dark Slate Blue
       2 Dark Slate Gray
     343 Ghost White
       3 Honey Dew
     343 Lavender
     343 Light Blue
     343 Light Green
      49 Medium Turquoise
      49 Mint Cream
     343 Orchid
      49 Pale Green
       6 Pink
      49 Plum
      46 Powder Blue
      49 Sky Blue
       6 Snow
      49 Teal
     394 Thistle
     343 White
     345 White Smoke

Flax Solvent data

Ariella#5 NG/OE 3 0 1 2 1 (Cross #17-20 3 flax genes on left)

• expected length 32-34
• ORGR OYGR RRRG GYRK YGYG RYRR ROYG RRGG RRYO GYOR YOOY YGRR RGRG GYGY RGYG RGGR KORG YRRR YGYO
• genome: KORGRGYGYGY|G|YORYRRRGGROYGRRYOOYGYRK, length 33

Default 5 weeds - 2 weeds(2 OR) and -2 weeds(3 Flax) Default -1 water +3 water(3 Flax) GYGYGYGY = 3 flax

Ariella#8 OE/NG 2 1 1 2 0 (Cross #17-20 rotten genes on right)

• expected length 32-34
• RYYO OYYO RRGY GYOR 2YYRG 2GYGY ORRK RGYO ORYY ORRG RGYG KRYY YOGY 2GRGY OGYG
• genome: KRYYOGYGYO|R|R|GYGYGYGRGYORYYRGROYYORRK, length 34 (R added) (if old theory is correct, this would be 3 flax, so the shortened genome is probably the right one)
• or genome: KRYYOGYGYORR|GYGYGRGYORYYRGROYYORRK, length 32 (gene dropped)
• other combos would be too long or too short (presuming baby is average length with gene added or dropped)
• flax: 2(GYGY)
• rotten flax: 1(RRGY)
• seeds: 1(RO)
• weeds: 5(default) - 3(OR) - 1(2 flax - 1) = 1 BUT WE HAVE 2
  • me might conclude: weeds is not dimished by (# flax -1) but by (# of GYGYGY strings) resulting in 5 - 3 - 0 = 2
• water: -1(default) + 2(flax) - 0(ROGY) = 1 BUT WE HAVE 0
  • we might conclude: hard to tell yet, could be add of(# of GYGYGY strings) so that GYGYGY converts a weed to water resulting in -1 + 0 = -1 thus 0; also would explain why high flax producers still can have 0 water like seen in Tale 3; would put the ROGY which was uncertain still in big doubt

Tedra #297 4 3 6 1 0 Flax/Rotten/Seeds/Weed/Water

7GYRR 5YGYY ROGY 5GYGY 6YROK 4OROY RRRG 3YRRG OROR YORR 2GYOR 2ROYR 4RORO 2RGYG 3RRGY YRRR OROO 4YGYR ORRG 2KRRO YGYG 2GYYG 3OORO 3OGYG 2RGYR 2YGYO RROG Need ROO? GYGR? OYR? ROG?

• genome: ...YROK (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

                            RGYG
                             GYGY
                              YGYG
KRRO                           GYGY
 RROG          RGYR             YGYR
  ROGY           YRRR            GYRR
   OGYG           RRRG            YRRG     OROO
     YGYO          RRGY            RRGY      OORO
      GYOR                 YGYY               OROR        
       YORR                 GYYG               RORO
        ORRG                                    OROY       
         RRGY                                    ROYR         
          RGYG or RGYR                             YROK
                                                                 

• the OK at end indicates there has been a full left part taken once in ascendents, since NE and NG do not have OK at end, unless 2 genes of NG were dropped in history (a conclusion that helps us no further)
• we expect: 4 GYGY, 3 RRGY, 6 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Tedra #253 5 2 6 0 1 Flax/Rotten/Seeds/Weed/Water

2OROR 2YGYG ORRG RRRR GYOR 4GYGY RRGY 2RORO 2GYYG KRRO ROGY RRRO YGYY

• genome: KRRO... (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

      OROR
            YGYG
        ORRG
              RRRR
           GYOR
           GYGY
         RRGY
     RORO
           GYYG
   KRRO
                 ROGY
               RRRO
             YGYY

• we expect: 5 GYGY, 2 RRGY, 6 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), at least 5 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, minimum 2 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Tedra #246 3 3 7 1 0

ORRG 3YORR 2ORRG RGYR RGYG OROY YRRG 4RORO RROG RRGY YGYR KRRO RRRO RROO

• genome: KRRO... (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

   KRRO
    RROG

• we expect: 3 GYGY, 3 RRGY, 7 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Zaniac #390 4 2 5 1 0

2YRGY 3YOGY 5YRRG 5RORO 2GYRG 2YROK 5GYGY 6GYRR 2OGYG 3YGYY RYYO 2ORRG 3RRGY OROY RROR 3OROR YGYG 2RGYR RGYG YGYO YORR ROYR 3YGYR KRYY 2GYOR OYRO YYOG

• genome: ...YROK (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

KRYY           YRGY              RROR       RORO
 RYYO           RGYR or RGYG                 OROY
  YYOG                                        ROYR
   YOGY                                        OYRO
    OGYG                                        YROK

• we expect: 4 GYGY, 2 RRGY, 5 RO (3 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (2 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)