The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.

If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.

Difference between revisions of "Frivolity Data"

From A Tale in the Desert
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Aperio proposes this vine: KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK I found this note on Rauul's page: Rauul#1 (acts exactly like Amusement is a Light red)Amusement-Frivolity (7L chest) This ...)
 
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Aperio proposes this vine:
+
Ariella Solvent Data T4
  
 +
GYRK
  
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
+
GYYYRR 2ROOYYG 2OOYYGG 2GGGGGY GGGGYY GGGYYY YYGGGG GGYYYR YRROOY 2YYYRRO YGGGGG KRROOY OYYGGG
 +
GGGGYR
  
 +
KRROOY
 +
  missing
 +
  ROOYYG
 +
    OOYYGG
 +
    OYYGGG
 +
      YYGGGG
 +
      YGGGGG
 +
        ?
 +
        GGGGGY
 +
        GGGGYY
 +
          GGGYYY
 +
              ?
 +
                GGYYYR
 +
                GYYYRR
 +
                  YYYRRO
 +
                  missing
 +
                    YRROOY
 +
                      missing
 +
                      ROOYYG
 +
                        OOYYGG
 +
                            ?
 +
                            GGGGYR
 +
                              GYRK
  
 
+
KRROOYYGGGGGYYYGGGYYYRROOYYGGGGGGYRK <br>
I found this note on Rauul's page:
+
based on mutagens, this seems only possibility left, would be happy if this was double checked.
Rauul#1 (acts exactly like Amusement is a Light red)Amusement-Frivolity (7L chest)
 
 
 
This interests me because it suggests that there was no impact on the tend table after a cross. That tells me that Frivolity's Color trait may be on the right splint and it's just sliding into the long G sequence. It also suggests that the trait information we have on Amusement's right splint is easy to replicate. I'm going to hammer it with milky trials and see what we get. -Aperio
 
 
 
Calen solvent data
 
 
 
YRK 
 
 
 
 
 
KRRO  RROO  ROOY  GYYY  YYGG  KROO 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Have conflicting data here with two sets starting with 'K'
 
OOYYG  YGGGG  YGGGY  YYYRR  YRROO  RROOY  ROOYY 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Aperio solvent data (200 trials)
 
 
 
Just a comment - I've never identified a new triplet after 100 trials and most appear after 50. This number seems sufficient to establish what triplets are present. This vine was the exception to the 50 trial guideline.
 
 
 
 
 
(21.5%) (43) GGG - 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
 
(08.0%) (16) GGY - 1111111111111111
 
(03.0%) (06) GYR - 111111
 
(04.5%) (09) GYY - 111111111
 
(05.5%) (11) KRR - 11111111111
 
(05.0%) (10) OOY - 1111111111
 
(06.0%) (12) OYY - 111111111111
 
(06.0%) (12) ROO - 111111111111
 
(06.0%) (12) RRO - 111111111111
 
(10.0%) (20) YGG - 11111111111111111111
 
(02.5%) (05) YRK - 11111
 
(03.0%) (06) YRR - 111111
 
(09.5%) (19) YYG - 1111111111111111111
 
(03.5%) (07) YYR - 1111111
 
(06.0%) (12) YYY - 111111111111
 
 
 
Frequency bands appear to be +/- 1.5% from 4.5%, 9.0%, 22.5%
 
 
 
 
 
YYY? YRR?
 
 
 
 
 
YYR and YYG pair with GYY and OYY and YYY has to next in there somewhere
 
GYR or YYR leads to YRK.  The other leads to YRR
 
KRR & YRR suggests a second RRO which necessitates a 2nd ROO which creates a 2nd OOY and OYY
 
 
 
 
 
One - KRR YRK
 
One - GYR GYY YRR YYR
 
Probably Two - YYY
 
Two (deduction) OOY OYY ROO RRO
 
Two - GGY YGG YYG (Could be 3, the high KRR prohibits me from easily going to 1 lower frequency band for singles)
 
Five - GGG
 
 
 
Post-mortem - looking at the Vine Theory stuff, I'm inclined to think I've got most of this one right. - Aperio
 
The A trait is probably represented by OOY and is expected to appear twice
 
The C trait is probably represented by RR and is expected to appear twice
 
The S trait is represented by YYY and is expected to appear twice
 
 
 
### Re-analysis Work-In-Progress
 
 
 
Frequency bands appear to be +/- 1.5% from 4.0%, 8.0%, 20.0%
 
 
 
* One - KRR YRK One - GYR GYY YRR YYR
 
* Two - YYY OOY OYY ROO RRO GGY YGG YYG
 
* Five - GGG ?
 
 
 
###
 
 
 
 
 
GGY + GYR = GGYR x1
 
GGY + GYY = GGYY x1
 
YYG + YGG = YYGG x2
 
OOY + OYY = OOYY x1
 
RRO + ROO = RROO x1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
 
KRR 1
 
  RRO 1
 
  RROO
 
  ROO 1
 
  ROOY
 
    OOY 1
 
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
 
  RROOY
 
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
 
    OOYYG
 
    OYY 1
 
      YYG 1
 
      YGG 1
 
      YYGG
 
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
 
      YGGGG
 
        GGG 1
 
        GGG 2
 
          GGG 3
 
          GGG 4
 
            GGY 1
 
            GYY 1
 
            GYYY
 
              YYY 1
 
              YYY 2
 
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
 
              YYYRR
 
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
 
                YRROO
 
                    OOY 2
 
                    OYY 2
 
                      YYG 2
 
                      YGG 2
 
                        GGG 5
 
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
 
                      YGGGY
 
                        GGY 2
 
                          GYR 1
 
                          YRK 1
 
KRROOYYGGGGGGYYYYRROOYYGGGYRK
 

Latest revision as of 23:22, 2 December 2009

Ariella Solvent Data T4

GYRK

GYYYRR 2ROOYYG 2OOYYGG 2GGGGGY GGGGYY GGGYYY YYGGGG GGYYYR YRROOY 2YYYRRO YGGGGG KRROOY OYYGGG GGGGYR

KRROOY
 missing
  ROOYYG
   OOYYGG
    OYYGGG
     YYGGGG
      YGGGGG
        ?
       GGGGGY
        GGGGYY
         GGGYYY
             ?
               GGYYYR
                GYYYRR
                 YYYRRO
                  missing
                    YRROOY
                     missing
                      ROOYYG
                       OOYYGG
                            ?
                           GGGGYR
                              GYRK

KRROOYYGGGGGYYYGGGYYYRROOYYGGGGGGYRK
based on mutagens, this seems only possibility left, would be happy if this was double checked.