The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.

If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Seba/Laws/The Good Judge"

From A Tale in the Desert
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Add you comments here please
+
Below is your way of talking about different sections of this Petition idea. Please do not abuse players or player ideas. Everyone is entitled to their views.
  
A conversation between Ichigo and myself:
+
When adding information please detail who is stating the information with the following format <b>~[</b><b>[User:Name]]</b>
  
Ichigo: Care to work on a draft?<br>
+
I (Seba) have the right to delete comments placed in here for any reason. Idea's suggested in here become the idea of the petition authour.
Seba: I can always try, thou not right now as Im teaching CS repair and E! Modding.<br>
 
Ichigo: Alright, I can hammer out one and then pass it on to you. Get you feedback<br>
 
Seba: sure, thats always good :)<br>
 
Ichigo: Judges<br>
 
Ichigo: Appointment<br>
 
Ichigo: A candidate must recieve a petition with 100 sigs. After doing so a vote will be called 13 judges will be elected<br>
 
Ichigo: by popular vote, one jud per region.<br>
 
Ichigo: Judges can be from any region.<br>
 
Ichigo: Judges hold their positions until removal or retirement.<br>
 
Ichigo: Removal-<br>
 
Ichigo: A judge may be stripped of their postion by a petition of removal (PoT) aquired from any ULead.<br>
 
Ichigo: PoT must have 50 sigs and upon being turned into any ULead, will strip named judge of thier postion.<br>
 
Ichigo: Any removed Judge is free to run again.<br>
 
Ichigo: Retirement defined-<br>
 
Ichigo: A judge who contacts a ULead, requesting removal, and after three days from the inital request does so again, is said to be retired and stripped of their power.<br>
 
Ichigo: Judges with an unpaid/expired account are considered retired after three days in unpayment/expirement.<br>
 
Ichigo: A retired judge gains the title "Retired Judge"<br>
 
Ichigo: A retired judge is free to run again.<br>
 
Ichigo: ____________<br>
 
Ichigo: Thats what I have so far.<br>
 
Ichigo: I will actually put the rest on the wiki, so as to make it much easier to view, etc.<br>
 
Seba: sounds good, personally (that seems to be my fav word tonight lol) 100 votes is to much, perhaps a Judge needs to state which region he is applying for (by visiting that regions ULead), he gets a petition, and only people that have their home location set to the same region can sign. This way it could for example be lowered to needing 50 people to give them this power.<br>
 
Ichigo: Yes, but would also make election much more complicated, perhaps leading Teppy to reject.<br>
 
Ichigo: At least I think it would<br>
 
Ichigo: Unless he already has those mechanics in place for DP's?<br>
 
Seba: Test of the king maker has big secrets in it<br>
 
Seba: (not that I know any of them)<br>
 
Ichigo: Sorry, I don't understand what you mean.<br>
 
Seba: The test of the King maker has things in it that people dont know about, they are to my knowledge meant to be getting powers of not just banishment.<br>
 
Seba: Im thinking that perhaps one king can leave a law behind once they depart and the next kings/queens from them have to follow those laws and then add them on at the end of their term... (etc)<br>
 
Ichigo: Interesting<br>
 
Seba: thats just my thinking, Ive nearly always been wrong when try to understand teppy thou :P<br>
 
Ichigo: lol<br>
 
Ichigo: Sorry, a bit tired, was that tied into the Judge thing somehow?<br>
 
Seba: no, just me rambling like a old man<br>
 
Ichigo: Haha ok.<br>
 
Seba: I think trying to please teppy isn't the best idea to do, (ie dont make it easy just cos we want it to be accepted first) I think we should try and get what we want, and then go from there. Dpending on how well teppy likes the idea he can always start talks and adments hopefully dont need other castings.<br>
 
Ichigo: Good point<br>
 
Seba: finding out how flexible he is at first is the best thing to do, if he is totally against it, theres no point in making it super easy to code in.<br>
 
Seba: Since E! has died down let me see what I can type up in a sleepy state<br>
 
  
=== Comments on Sections ===
+
:Did this ever happen? Is this idea still live? [[User:Akilan|Akilan]] 21:45, 13 June 2009 (EST)
The law fails to establish how players may contact a judge.
+
 
 +
=== General Feedback ===
 +
It would probably be worthwhile to review http://atitd.com/lawmaking.html
 +
Before a makes it to the ballots, it must survive potential developer veto.  The lawmaking page on atitd.com outlines a number of things that qualify for these vetoes.  Many sections of this draft constitute physicsvetoes (they violate the "physics" of egypt, allowing players to do things that are not possible) or techvetoes (they would be extremely complex / impractical to implement).  Also, there is a maximum length for laws (they must fit in the text box when you create your petition), and I believe the current draft here is quite a bit larger than that.
 +
 
 +
Beyond that, Egyptians have traditionally (in previous Tales) been reluctant to grant broad powers to others that could significantly affect their gameplay experience.  In particular, I feel that the Judges being granted sweeping powers for "punishment" with no restrictions preventing their arbitrary use (other than a procedure to remove a Judge, which could take some time) is something that would make this very unlikely to pass as-is, assuming it made it to the ballot.
 +
 
 +
It may be more productive to break it into a small serious of laws -- one for appointing judges (possibly via a more simplified process less likely to techveto), then later laws empowering judges.
 +
 
 +
-- Quinton
 +
 
 +
= Current Sections =
 +
<div align="center" style="background-color:#e7cd39;-moz-border-radius-topright:2em;-moz-border-radius-topleft: 2em;-webkit-border-radius:20px;border:1px solid #000;padding:10px;"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-weight:bold;">The Good Judge</span><br>An idea by Seba<br>Helped out by Ichigo</div>
 +
 
 +
== The Good Judge ==
 +
 
 +
=== § Positions: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Appointment: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Voting: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Vacancies: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Duty: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Powers: ===
 +
Move Structures:<br>
 +
 
 +
Destruction of Structures:<br>
 +
 
 +
Exile to Prison:<br>
 +
 
 +
Teleportation:<br>
 +
 
 +
=== § Titles: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Retirement: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Removal of a Judge: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Prison: ===
 +
 
 +
= New Sections =
 +
This is where new sections may be added to the petition idea.
 +
 
 +
== The Good Judge ==
 +
 
 +
=== Contacting a Judge ===
 +
<i>The law fails to establish how players may contact a judge.
 +
::More ideas welcome, while this would be nice, Demi-Pharaohs from tale 3 seemed to get a pretty big call out without having this ability. I do like this idea thou! But I think it will be vetoed. The way GMs get their calls is that all dev call go to the same board and GMs can see DEV calls, but are simply asked not to answer such calls. I doubt a new board would be allowed to be created for Judges. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
  
 
§ Contacting a Judge:<br>
 
§ Contacting a Judge:<br>
 +
Players may contact a Judge through their special menu, much like contacting a GM.
  
Players may contact a Judge through their special menu, much like contacting a GM.
+
=== Judge Code of Conduct ===
 +
<i>I believe you mean "Code of Conduct", for this reason I have changed this expression. Further more I think players should ask what is good for a Judge to do and not do, the petition itself is just getting Judges up and running, its then up to players to say {CoC: "Judges shall not use their powers without first having a fair trail as set out below....."} ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
  
§ Judge Code of Contact:<br>
+
§ Judge Code of Conduct:<br>
 
I feel one should be made up, giving people an idea of why they should remove a Judge, even though no reason is needed.
 
I feel one should be made up, giving people an idea of why they should remove a Judge, even though no reason is needed.
 +
 +
=== Judge Communications ===
 +
<i>Judges will be able to create a Guild Hall for this purpose. This doesn't need to be an added feature that the game handles. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
  
 
§ Judge Communications:<br>
 
§ Judge Communications:<br>
 
Upon election Judges will join the channel "Judge". Only Judges may join this channel. Retired Judges are permitted to join.
 
Upon election Judges will join the channel "Judge". Only Judges may join this channel. Retired Judges are permitted to join.
  
==== § Appointment ====
+
=== Titles ===
To be added:<br>
+
Added. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]
This vote is to be referred to as the initial vote. After the initial vote, whenever a vacancy arises a new vote will be called within one week. Candidates have one week to turn in their petitions, allowing a world wide vote to take place.
+
 
 +
== The Good Judge ==
 +
 
 +
Good idea however as I stated on the forums this is way too long, please note I shred alot of this in a attempt to get it under the 1500 charactor limit. Bannable or prision issues should be taken to a Demipharaoh or GM so prison should be dropped for now. I beleive the following covers most of what you are trying to do. Sadly this is almost 1800 charactors<br>
 +
 
 +
=== § Duty: ===
 +
 
 +
This should be 2 sentences or less.<br>
 +
 
 +
=== § Appointment: ===
 +
 
 +
§ Visit a University of Leadership to collect a Petition of Judges <br>
 +
§ After collect 30 signatures from paid accounts the petition can be returned to become a Judge.<br>
 +
§ If there are more judges than positions (total positions being 26) Judges shall be picked at random from the group.<br>
 +
§ A judge shall hold office for 1 month or having been offline for 10 days real time whichever comes first.<br>
 +
§ At any time when the total judges is less than 26 a new judge shall be picked at random from all applicants.<br>
  
A Judge shall recieve the title of "Judge".
+
=== § Powers: ===
 
==== § Voting ====
 
The Number Judges recieving the highest percentage of Yes votes are elected. The Number is defined as the amount of vacent Judge positions.
 
  
==== § Duty ====
+
Move Structures: Any structure dependent on its location (ie Mines), or a compound of 16 sectors or larger with a cornerstone inplace may not be moved.<br>
 +
Destruction of Structures: Structures required for Test (ie Obelisks) cannot be removed.<br>
 +
Teleportation: A judge will be given the ablity to teleport to the plantiff (charactor which submitted the case) as well as to the closest chariot stop these fast travel uses will require no travel time.<br>
  
==== § Powers ====
+
=== § Cases: ===
<blockquote>
 
Judges get further permissions to tear structures down in which are not for the purposes of completing a Test (ie Obelisks), and where explained by Developers to need a veto from this law when not a test structure.</blockquote>
 
I don't understand this line. I also feel powers should be defined in a bit greater detail. I.e Judges may travel free of charge to the locations of disputes. etc.[[User:Ichigo|Ichigo]]
 
==== § Retirement and Removal ====
 
A retired Judge will gain the title "Retired Judge" and may visit Prison free of charge, a retired Judge is able to assist current Judges by assisting with the Maintnance of Prison. They have all powers that any other Judge has at Prison with the exception of sending an Exiled back to Egypt.
 
  
==== § Prison ====
+
§ A case will be created by a player of a paid account creating a case petition @ a university or school of leadership. A case petition will require to be signed by 10 paid accounts of level 7 or higher and turned in at a university or school of leadership before it can be accessed by a judge.<br>
 +
§ A Judge can take only take a max of 2 cases from a university of leadership or school of leadership at anytime.<br>
 +
§ Once a case has been reveiwed the judge shall take action they deam required, and close the case via a popup with the following option, Case Closed.<br> ''this could be abused and should be rewritten''
 +
§ A plantiff may not have more than one case open at any time and must wait for 4 days after the closing of one case before opening another case.<br>
 +
§ A plantiff may close a case they submitted at anytime.<br>
  
Any Judge shall be allowed to remove any prisoner from Prison.
+
Added. ~[[User:Carden|Carden]]

Latest revision as of 02:45, 14 June 2009

Below is your way of talking about different sections of this Petition idea. Please do not abuse players or player ideas. Everyone is entitled to their views.

When adding information please detail who is stating the information with the following format ~[[User:Name]]

I (Seba) have the right to delete comments placed in here for any reason. Idea's suggested in here become the idea of the petition authour.

Did this ever happen? Is this idea still live? Akilan 21:45, 13 June 2009 (EST)

General Feedback

It would probably be worthwhile to review http://atitd.com/lawmaking.html Before a makes it to the ballots, it must survive potential developer veto. The lawmaking page on atitd.com outlines a number of things that qualify for these vetoes. Many sections of this draft constitute physicsvetoes (they violate the "physics" of egypt, allowing players to do things that are not possible) or techvetoes (they would be extremely complex / impractical to implement). Also, there is a maximum length for laws (they must fit in the text box when you create your petition), and I believe the current draft here is quite a bit larger than that.

Beyond that, Egyptians have traditionally (in previous Tales) been reluctant to grant broad powers to others that could significantly affect their gameplay experience. In particular, I feel that the Judges being granted sweeping powers for "punishment" with no restrictions preventing their arbitrary use (other than a procedure to remove a Judge, which could take some time) is something that would make this very unlikely to pass as-is, assuming it made it to the ballot.

It may be more productive to break it into a small serious of laws -- one for appointing judges (possibly via a more simplified process less likely to techveto), then later laws empowering judges.

-- Quinton

Current Sections

The Good Judge
An idea by Seba
Helped out by Ichigo

The Good Judge

§ Positions:

§ Appointment:

§ Voting:

§ Vacancies:

§ Duty:

§ Powers:

Move Structures:

Destruction of Structures:

Exile to Prison:

Teleportation:

§ Titles:

§ Retirement:

§ Removal of a Judge:

§ Prison:

New Sections

This is where new sections may be added to the petition idea.

The Good Judge

Contacting a Judge

The law fails to establish how players may contact a judge.

More ideas welcome, while this would be nice, Demi-Pharaohs from tale 3 seemed to get a pretty big call out without having this ability. I do like this idea thou! But I think it will be vetoed. The way GMs get their calls is that all dev call go to the same board and GMs can see DEV calls, but are simply asked not to answer such calls. I doubt a new board would be allowed to be created for Judges. ~Seba

§ Contacting a Judge:
Players may contact a Judge through their special menu, much like contacting a GM.

Judge Code of Conduct

I believe you mean "Code of Conduct", for this reason I have changed this expression. Further more I think players should ask what is good for a Judge to do and not do, the petition itself is just getting Judges up and running, its then up to players to say {CoC: "Judges shall not use their powers without first having a fair trail as set out below....."} ~Seba

§ Judge Code of Conduct:
I feel one should be made up, giving people an idea of why they should remove a Judge, even though no reason is needed.

Judge Communications

Judges will be able to create a Guild Hall for this purpose. This doesn't need to be an added feature that the game handles. ~Seba

§ Judge Communications:
Upon election Judges will join the channel "Judge". Only Judges may join this channel. Retired Judges are permitted to join.

Titles

Added. ~Seba

The Good Judge

Good idea however as I stated on the forums this is way too long, please note I shred alot of this in a attempt to get it under the 1500 charactor limit. Bannable or prision issues should be taken to a Demipharaoh or GM so prison should be dropped for now. I beleive the following covers most of what you are trying to do. Sadly this is almost 1800 charactors

§ Duty:

This should be 2 sentences or less.

§ Appointment:

§ Visit a University of Leadership to collect a Petition of Judges
§ After collect 30 signatures from paid accounts the petition can be returned to become a Judge.
§ If there are more judges than positions (total positions being 26) Judges shall be picked at random from the group.
§ A judge shall hold office for 1 month or having been offline for 10 days real time whichever comes first.
§ At any time when the total judges is less than 26 a new judge shall be picked at random from all applicants.

§ Powers:

Move Structures: Any structure dependent on its location (ie Mines), or a compound of 16 sectors or larger with a cornerstone inplace may not be moved.
Destruction of Structures: Structures required for Test (ie Obelisks) cannot be removed.
Teleportation: A judge will be given the ablity to teleport to the plantiff (charactor which submitted the case) as well as to the closest chariot stop these fast travel uses will require no travel time.

§ Cases:

§ A case will be created by a player of a paid account creating a case petition @ a university or school of leadership. A case petition will require to be signed by 10 paid accounts of level 7 or higher and turned in at a university or school of leadership before it can be accessed by a judge.
§ A Judge can take only take a max of 2 cases from a university of leadership or school of leadership at anytime.
§ Once a case has been reveiwed the judge shall take action they deam required, and close the case via a popup with the following option, Case Closed.
this could be abused and should be rewritten § A plantiff may not have more than one case open at any time and must wait for 4 days after the closing of one case before opening another case.
§ A plantiff may close a case they submitted at anytime.

Added. ~Carden