|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Aperio now favors this genome
| |
| − |
| |
| − | KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGGK
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Calen solvent data
| |
| − |
| |
| − | OGYRO GYROG GGGGG
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Aperio Solvent Data (just to get acquainted)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I will continue to track multiples because they are the best clue to repeats in the string and this one is supposed to be (KKK) of which the K trait is expected to be YRO (I hope to debunk the OGG string as the K trait).
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (45) GGG IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
| |
| − | (07) GGK IIIIIII
| |
| − | (04) GYR IIII
| |
| − | (01) KYR I
| |
| − | (07) OGG IIIIIII
| |
| − | (13) OGY IIIIIIIIIIIII
| |
| − | (12) ROG IIIIIIIIIIII
| |
| − | (10) YRO IIIIIIIIII
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Out of 101 trials, 45% were GGG. With GGGGG (5) being a clue, there are 3 ways to hit that with GGG (3) and 4 ways to hit GGGGGG (6) or GGG(3)/GGGGG(5). I would expect other triplets to hit 15% or 11.25% under those conditions.
| |
| − | It's unlikely that any other triples are repeated in the sequence or you'd see something in the 20%-25% range.
| |
| − | The only extraordinary outlier is the KYR clue hitting only once, whereas the other endpoint GGK hit 7 times. I wish I could explain it away as GGY, instead of GGK.
| |
| − | Upon analysis, though, It looks like YRO & ROG do repeat
| |
| − | I don't believe OGG can repeat because it's no more common than the GGK endpoint.
| |
| − | If OGG does not repeat, then all the GGG hits are bunched together and at the end. The lack of a single GGx clue is telling.
| |
| − | If YRO & OGG repeat, then GGG must appear 3 times as often.
| |
| − | Only GGG appears more than 2x, so unless some combination of G's is the Skin trait (K), I don't have a clear favorite for it because it is supposed to appear 3 times. YRO is not so common that I could statistically claim that it might appear 3x and summarily rule out OGG which appears 2/3 as often.
| |
| − | I propose:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | KYROGYROGGGGGGGGK
| |
| − | KYR
| |
| − | YRO 1
| |
| − | ROG 1
| |
| − | OGY 1
| |
| − | GYR 1
| |
| − | YRO 2
| |
| − | ROG 2
| |
| − | OGG 1
| |
| − | GGG 1
| |
| − | GGG 2
| |
| − | GGG 3
| |
| − | GGG 4
| |
| − | GGG 5
| |
| − | GGG 6
| |
| − | GGK 1
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Two possibilities suggest themselves to me:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The Skin Trait (K) might have a default trait to which KK could be added. This seems unlikely since conventional wisdom has always said otherwise.
| |
| − | Their could be an additional repetition of some of these traits and GYR might be under represented in this pool.
| |
| | Ariella Solvent Data to test theory | | Ariella Solvent Data to test theory |
| | | | |
| − | GYROGYR - 3 YROGYRO - 2 OGYROGY GGGGGGK | + | GYROGYR - 3 YROGYRO - 2 OGYROGY GGGGGGK ROGGGGG GGGGGGG OGGGGGG ROGYROG |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Aperio Solvent Data (Second Run)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | (49) GGG 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
| |
| − | (03) GGK 111
| |
| − | (04) GYR 1111
| |
| − | (04) KYR 1111
| |
| − | (04) OGG 1111
| |
| − | (11) OGY 11111111111
| |
| − | (11) ROG 11111111111
| |
| − | (13) YRO 1111111111111
| |
| − | | |
| − | Just a note about my technique here. One of the concerns being addressed is to minimize a perceptibly non-random random number generator. Between my recording the results and clicking the close on the popup, I will also vary my clicks (in case it's is time-hashed) by manually counting to 3-7 and then clicking. I will duplicate numbers, go back to a number I just did or pick a new number. It's not perfect, but it's the thought that counts.
| |
| − | | |
| − | By convention, I'm now alphabetizing the substrings.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Aperio Solvent Data (200 combined trials)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | (47.0%) (94) GGG 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
| |
| − | (05.0%) (10) GGK 1111111111
| |
| − | (04.0%) (08) GYR 11111111
| |
| − | (02.5%) (05) KYR 11111
| |
| − | (05.5%) (11) OGG 11111111111
| |
| − | (12.0%) (24) OGY 111111111111111111111111
| |
| − | (11.5%) (23) ROG 11111111111111111111111
| |
| − | (11.5%) (23) YRO 11111111111111111111111
| |
| − | | |
| − | The frequency bands appear to be 4%, 12% and 48%
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | GGK KYR by definition appear once.
| |
| − | GYR OGG could appear once or twice.
| |
| − | OGY ROG RYO all appear thrice.
| |
| − | GYR *MUST* appear twice to support YRO. GYR OGY and YRO *explicitly* appear twice in Ariella's data and ROG appears implicitly twice.
| |
| − | OGG cannot appear twice because there is no GG(non-K) clue and even single repetitions are showing up 2.5%-5% of the time. I'm not certain how many trials for this anomaly to settle itself out.
| |
| − | GGG appears twelve times.
| |
| − | I propose:
| |
| | | | |
| − | KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGGK
| |
| | KYR | | KYR |
| | + | missing |
| | YROGYRO | | YROGYRO |
| − | YRO 1
| + | ROGYROG |
| − | ROG 1 | |
| − | OGY 1
| |
| − | KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGGK
| |
| − | OGYRO
| |
| | OGYROGY | | OGYROGY |
| − | GYROG
| |
| − | GYR 1
| |
| − | YRO 2
| |
| − | KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGGK
| |
| − | ROG 2
| |
| − | OGY 2
| |
| − | KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGGK
| |
| | GYROGYR | | GYROGYR |
| − | GYR 2 (?!)
| + | missing |
| − | OGYRO
| + | ROGYROG |
| − | YROGYRO | + | ROGGGGG |
| − | YRO
| + | OGGGGGG |
| − | KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGGK
| + | ? |
| − | GYROG
| + | GGGGGGG |
| − | ROG | + | GGGGGGK |
| − | OGG 1 | |
| − | GGGGG
| |
| − | GGG 1
| |
| − | GGG 2 | |
| − | GGG 3 | |
| − | GGG 4
| |
| − | GGG 5
| |
| − | GGG 6
| |
| − | GGG 7
| |
| − | GGG 8
| |
| − | GGG 9
| |
| − | GGG 10
| |
| − | GGG 11
| |
| − | GGG 12
| |
| − | GGGGGGK
| |
| − | GGK 1
| |
| − | KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGGK
| |
