The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.

If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Seba/Laws/The Good Judge"

From A Tale in the Desert
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Below is your way of talking about different sections of this Petition idea. Please do not abuse players or player ideas. Everyone is entitled to their views.
 +
 +
When adding information please detail who is stating the information with the following format <b>~[</b><b>[User:Name]]</b>
 +
 +
I (Seba) have the right to delete comments placed in here for any reason. Idea's suggested in here become the idea of the petition authour.
 +
 
= Current Sections =
 
= Current Sections =
== § Appointment ==
+
<div align="center" style="background-color:#e7cd39;-moz-border-radius-topright:2em;-moz-border-radius-topleft: 2em;-webkit-border-radius:20px;border:1px solid #000;padding:10px;"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-weight:bold;">The Good Judge</span><br>An idea by Seba<br>Helped out by Ichigo</div>
This vote is to be referred to as the initial vote. After the initial vote, whenever a vacancy arises a new vote will be called within one week. Candidates have one week to turn in their petitions, allowing a world wide vote to take place. <i>Is this needed it seems like bloat? ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
+
 
+
== The Good Judge ==
== § Voting ==
+
 
The Number Judges receiving the highest percentage of Yes votes are elected. The Number is defined as the amount of vacent Judge positions. <i>Was this fixed? ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
+
=== § Positions: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Appointment: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Voting: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Vacancies: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Duty: ===
 +
 
 +
=== § Powers: ===
 +
Move Structures:<br>
 +
 
 +
Destruction of Structures:<br>
 +
 
 +
Exile to Prison:<br>
 +
 
 +
Teleportation:<br>
 +
 
 +
=== § Titles: ===
  
== § Duty ==
+
=== § Retirement: ===
  
== § Powers ==
+
=== § Removal of a Judge: ===
  
Judges get further permissions to tear structures down in which are not for the purposes of completing a Test (ie Obelisks),<br>and where explained by Developers to need a veto from this law when not a test structure.
+
=== § Prison: ===
<i>I don't understand this line. I also feel powers should be defined in a bit greater detail. I.e Judges may travel free of charge to the locations of disputes. etc.[[User:Ichigo|Ichigo]]
 
:Does this fix it?<br>Structures are able to be torn down in which are not for the purposes of completing a Test (ie Obelisks). Developers at the time of the Petition are allowed to veto current structures as they please, new structures will hopefully have a discussion on whether or not it is allowed to be torn down Judges.</i>
 
== § Retirement and Removal ==
 
A retired Judge will gain the title "Retired Judge" and may visit Prison free of charge, a retired Judge is able to assist current Judges with the Maintenance of Prison. They have all powers that any other Judge has at Prison with the exception of sending an Exiled back to Egypt.
 
  
== § Prison ==
 
It looks good. Though I would like to see some form of punishment where egypt can use the resources that were made. Which could be accomplished by changing the wording, or by judges saying well, either get 100 slate while in egypt or get 200 in prison.
 
Nothing is allowed to be brought into the realm by Judge, Exiled, or Visitor. Nothing is allowed to leave the realm.
 
The above could be changed, allowing judges to bring things into the realm, and be able to take things out. But the Judge working for the benefit of Egypt through their actions before sending someone to prison would likely be the better solution. [[User:Ichigo|Ichigo]]
 
 
= New Sections =
 
= New Sections =
 
This is where new sections may be added to the petition idea.
 
This is where new sections may be added to the petition idea.
== Contacting a Judge ==
+
 
 +
== The Good Judge ==
 +
 
 +
=== Contacting a Judge ===
 
<i>The law fails to establish how players may contact a judge.
 
<i>The law fails to establish how players may contact a judge.
 
::More ideas welcome, while this would be nice, Demi-Pharaohs from tale 3 seemed to get a pretty big call out without having this ability. I do like this idea thou! But I think it will be vetoed. The way GMs get their calls is that all dev call go to the same board and GMs can see DEV calls, but are simply asked not to answer such calls. I doubt a new board would be allowed to be created for Judges. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
 
::More ideas welcome, while this would be nice, Demi-Pharaohs from tale 3 seemed to get a pretty big call out without having this ability. I do like this idea thou! But I think it will be vetoed. The way GMs get their calls is that all dev call go to the same board and GMs can see DEV calls, but are simply asked not to answer such calls. I doubt a new board would be allowed to be created for Judges. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
Line 29: Line 49:
 
Players may contact a Judge through their special menu, much like contacting a GM.
 
Players may contact a Judge through their special menu, much like contacting a GM.
  
== Judge Code of Conduct ==
+
=== Judge Code of Conduct ===
 
<i>I believe you mean "Code of Conduct", for this reason I have changed this expression. Further more I think players should ask what is good for a Judge to do and not do, the petition itself is just getting Judges up and running, its then up to players to say {CoC: "Judges shall not use their powers without first having a fair trail as set out below....."} ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
 
<i>I believe you mean "Code of Conduct", for this reason I have changed this expression. Further more I think players should ask what is good for a Judge to do and not do, the petition itself is just getting Judges up and running, its then up to players to say {CoC: "Judges shall not use their powers without first having a fair trail as set out below....."} ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
  
Line 35: Line 55:
 
I feel one should be made up, giving people an idea of why they should remove a Judge, even though no reason is needed.
 
I feel one should be made up, giving people an idea of why they should remove a Judge, even though no reason is needed.
  
== Judge Communications ==
+
=== Judge Communications ===
 
<i>Judges will be able to create a Guild Hall for this purpose. This doesn't need to be an added feature that the game handles. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
 
<i>Judges will be able to create a Guild Hall for this purpose. This doesn't need to be an added feature that the game handles. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i>
  
Line 41: Line 61:
 
Upon election Judges will join the channel "Judge". Only Judges may join this channel. Retired Judges are permitted to join.
 
Upon election Judges will join the channel "Judge". Only Judges may join this channel. Retired Judges are permitted to join.
  
== Titles ==
+
=== Titles ===
Added
+
Added. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]

Revision as of 09:08, 27 December 2008

Below is your way of talking about different sections of this Petition idea. Please do not abuse players or player ideas. Everyone is entitled to their views.

When adding information please detail who is stating the information with the following format ~[[User:Name]]

I (Seba) have the right to delete comments placed in here for any reason. Idea's suggested in here become the idea of the petition authour.

Current Sections

The Good Judge
An idea by Seba
Helped out by Ichigo

The Good Judge

§ Positions:

§ Appointment:

§ Voting:

§ Vacancies:

§ Duty:

§ Powers:

Move Structures:

Destruction of Structures:

Exile to Prison:

Teleportation:

§ Titles:

§ Retirement:

§ Removal of a Judge:

§ Prison:

New Sections

This is where new sections may be added to the petition idea.

The Good Judge

Contacting a Judge

The law fails to establish how players may contact a judge.

More ideas welcome, while this would be nice, Demi-Pharaohs from tale 3 seemed to get a pretty big call out without having this ability. I do like this idea thou! But I think it will be vetoed. The way GMs get their calls is that all dev call go to the same board and GMs can see DEV calls, but are simply asked not to answer such calls. I doubt a new board would be allowed to be created for Judges. ~Seba

§ Contacting a Judge:
Players may contact a Judge through their special menu, much like contacting a GM.

Judge Code of Conduct

I believe you mean "Code of Conduct", for this reason I have changed this expression. Further more I think players should ask what is good for a Judge to do and not do, the petition itself is just getting Judges up and running, its then up to players to say {CoC: "Judges shall not use their powers without first having a fair trail as set out below....."} ~Seba

§ Judge Code of Conduct:
I feel one should be made up, giving people an idea of why they should remove a Judge, even though no reason is needed.

Judge Communications

Judges will be able to create a Guild Hall for this purpose. This doesn't need to be an added feature that the game handles. ~Seba

§ Judge Communications:
Upon election Judges will join the channel "Judge". Only Judges may join this channel. Retired Judges are permitted to join.

Titles

Added. ~Seba