The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.
If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.
User:Ariella
Funerary Temple
Tiles Used:
26 Alice Blue 49 Black 8 Dark Green 47 Dark Slate Blue 2 Dark Slate Gray 343 Ghost White 3 Honey Dew 343 Lavender 343 Light Blue 343 Light Green 49 Medium Turquoise 49 Mint Cream 343 Orchid 49 Pale Green 6 Pink 49 Plum 46 Powder Blue 49 Sky Blue 6 Snow 49 Teal 394 Thistle 343 White 345 White Smoke
Flax Solvent data
Ariella#5 NG/OE 3 0 1 2 1 (Cross #17-20 3 flax genes on left)
- expected length 32-34
- ORGR OYGR RRRG GYRK YGYG RYRR ROYG RRGG RRYO GYOR YOOY YGRR RGRG GYGY RGYG RGGR KORG YRRR YGYO
- genome: KORGRGYGYGY|G|YORYRRRGGROYGRRYOOYGYRK, length 33
Default 5 weeds - 2 weeds(2 OR) and -2 weeds(3 Flax) Default -1 water +3 water(3 Flax) GYGYGYGY = 3 flax
Ariella#8 OE/NG 2 1 1 2 0 (Cross #17-20 rotten genes on right)
- expected lengtht 32-34
- RYYO OYYO RRGY GYOR 2YYRG 2GYGY ORRK RGYO ORYY ORRG RGYG KRYY YOGY 2GRGY OGYG
- genome: KRYYOGYGYO|R|R|GYGYGYGRGYORYYRGROYYORRK, length 34 (R added) (if old theory is correct, this would be 3 flax, so the shortened genome is probably the right one)
- or genome: KRYYOGYGYORR|GYGYGRGYORYYRGROYYORRK, length 32 (gene dropped)
- other combos would be too long or too short (presuming baby is average length with gene added or dropped)
- flax: 2(GYGY)
- rotten flax: 1(RRGY)
- seeds: 1(RO)
- weeds: 5(default) - 3(OR) - 1(2 flax - 1) = 1 BUT WE HAVE 2
- me might conclude: weeds is not dimished by (# flax -1) but by (# of GYGYGY strings) resulting in 5 - 3 - 0 = 2
- water: -1(default) + 2(flax) - 0(ROGY) = 1 BUT WE HAVE 0
- we might conclude: hard to tell yet, could be add of(# of GYGYGY strings) so that GYGYGY converts a weed to water resulting in -1 + 0 = -1 thus 0; also would explain why high flax producers still can have 0 water like seen in Tale 3; would put the ROGY which was uncertain still in big doubt
Tedra #297 4 3 6 1 0 Flax/Rotten/Seeds/Weed/Water
4GYRR YGYY ROGY 2GYGY 2YROK OROY RRRG YRRG OROR YORR GYOR ROYR RORO RGYG RRGY
- genome: ...YROK (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)
GYRR YGYY ROGY GYGY YROK OROY RRRG YRRG OROR YORR GYOR ROYR RORO RGYG RRGY
- the OK at end indicates there has been a full left part taken once in ascendents, since NE and NG do not have OK at end, unless 2 genes of NG were dropped in history (a conclusion that helps us no further)
- we expect: 4 GYGY, 3 RRGY, 6 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)
Tedra #253 5 2 6 0 1 Flax/Rotten/Seeds/Weed/Water
2OROR 2YGYG ORRG RRRR GYOR 4GYGY RRGY 2RORO 2GYYG KRRO ROGY RRRO YGYY
- genome: KRRO... (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)
OROR YGYG ORRG RRRR GYOR GYGY RRGY RORO GYYG KRRO ROGY RRRO YGYY
- we expect: 5 GYGY, 2 RRGY, 6 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), at least 5 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, minimum 2 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)
Tedra #246 3 3 7 1 0
ORRG 3YORR 2ORRG RGYR RGYG OROY YRRG 4RORO RROG RRGY YGYR KRRO RRRO RROO
- genome: KRRO... (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)
KRRO RROG
- we expect: 3 GYGY, 3 RRGY, 7 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)
Zaniac #390 4 2 5 1 0
2YRGY 2YOGY 3YRRG 2RORO GYRG YROK 3GYGY 2GYRR OGYG YGYY RYYO ORRG RRGY
- genome: ...YROK (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)
YROK
- we expect: 4 GYGY, 2 RRGY, 5 RO (3 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (2 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)