The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.
If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.
Talk:Firepit
Can someone add pictures of the orange - yellow - white stages, and make it a bit clearer when to stoke the fire? It's tough to do with just this info. -shadeking
Data
stokes | limestone | dried flax | leeks | dried papyrus | -> | lime | ash | charcoal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 13 | 32 | 25 | |
0 | 100 | - | - | - | 13 | 0 | 25 | |
0 | - | - | 100 | - | 0 | 4 | 25 | |
1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | - | 13 | 4 | 25 | |
15 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 19 | 51 | 35 | |
25 | 100 | 100 | - | - | 21 | 18 | 39 | |
25? | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 22 | 60 | 40 | |
30 | 100 | 100 | - | - | 22 | 19 | 42 | |
30? | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 22 | 61 | 41 | |
50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 26 | 76 | 48 |
Not sure if anyone's collecting stoke data (appears similar to T3). Here's a data point to start with:
200 limestone; 100 dried flax; 200 wood @ 25 stokes (~18 mins) = 21 Lime, 18 Ash, 39 cc
100 limestone; 100 dried flax; 100 leeks; 200 wood @ 1 stoke = 13 lime, 4 ash, 25 cc
Here's my T4 data:
100 limestone; 100 dried flax; 100 dried papyrus; 100 leeks; 200 wood @ 15 stokes = 19 lime, 51 ash, 35 cc
McArine data(not sure about the 30 stoke one being 30 stokes):
- 100 limestone; 100 dried flax; 100 dried papyrus; 100 leeks; 200 wood @ 0 stokes = 13 lime, 32 ash, 25 cc
- 100 limestone; 100 dried flax; 100 dried papyrus; 100 leeks; 200 wood @ 25 stokes = 22 lime, 60 ash, 40 cc
- 100 limestone; 100 dried flax; 100 dried papyrus; 100 leeks; 200 wood @ 30 stokes = 22 lime, 61 ash, 41 cc
- 100 limestone; 100 dried flax; 100 dried papyrus; 100 leeks; 200 wood @ 50 stokes = 26 lime, 76 ash, 48 cc
More: 100 limestone, 0 stokes -> 13 lime 100 leeks, 0 stokes -> 4 ash
Speed?
How quickly does the color cycle? I tried once and apparently missed the stoking point entirely, even though I thought I was seeing the color progression. -- Shebi 00:10, 13 January 2009 (EST)