Aperio 003 Data

Back to User:Aperio

Aperio #3 Initial Grapes = 8 (50 trials of Clear Solvent [4 genes])
(1) KYRY	11
(1) RYRY	111
(2) RYYR	111 111 111 1
(2) YYRY	111 111 111 11
(1) YRYR	111 1
(3) YRYY	111 111 111 111 111 11
(1) YYRK	111

Aperio #3 Initial Grapes = 8 (2 trials of Crystal Solvent [6 genes])
RYYRYY	1
YRYRYY	1
      YRY RYY
          RYY RYY (a span of 9 genes)
OR
       RY YRY Y
              YRY RYY (a span of 11 genes seems pretty improbable knowing there are 2 more AND we lost the prepended G)

In the hopes of getting an endpoint and figuring out where the 2nd pattern break resulted, I thought I'd try again.

Aperio #3 Initial Grapes = 8 (8 trials of Crystal Solvent [6 genes])
(2) RYYRYY	1111
(1) YRYYRY	11
(1) YYRYYR	11
K 
  YRY RYY (Set 1)
      RYY RYY (Set 1)
      RYY RYY (Set 2)
        Y RYY RY (Set 2)
          RYY RYY (Set 2)
           YY RYY R (Set 2)
                  RK
K YRY RYY RYY RYY RK (13 genes)

Aperio #3 Initial Grapes = 8 (8 trials of Diamond Solvent [7 genes])
(?) YYRYYRY	1
       YY RYY RY
K YRY RYY RYY RYY RK (13 genes)

ORIGINAL
    K GYR YYR YYR YYR K (12)
           Q   Q   Q

(1) K YRY
(1)   YRY RYY
(1)   YRY R
(1)    RY RY
(1)     Y RYY (of 3)
(1)       RYY RYY
(1)       RYY R (of 2)
(1)        YY RY (of 2)
(2)         Y RYY (of 3)
(2)           RYY R of (2)
(1)            YY RK
    K YRY RYY RYY RK (10)
            Q   Q

Alternatively,
    K YRY RYY RYY RYY RK (13)
            Q   Q   Q
    K YRY RYY RYY RYY RK (13 genes)

10 is supported by the loss of the G, suggesting shortening. What is not clear is how we get the second shortening. Would more solvent tests be useful?

Getting the right endpoint would tell me I've got it right but not how many YRYYs there should be Getting the left endpoint would tell me I've got it right and leave us with the same mystery Everything else is a failure (e.g. RYRYYR is pretty much a given)

Going to do a low-tech Quality Check on vineyards to see how many Qs I should be looking for.

These checks suggest it's still QQQ. I'm at a loss.

1. The leftmost gene, G, dropped. KYRY proves this. Presumably, this would be the splice point (Gene 1) and there was a shortening. I'd be fine with that but it doesn't fit the other evidence.
2. There is a dropped Y somewhere in the middle resulting in a RYRY / YRYR pattern that doesn't exist naturally in Appreciation. It's GYRY on the left endpoint and it RYYR / YYRY / YRYY repeated everwhyere else. If there's a single splice point in the middle to explain this, there's no suitable explanation for the dropped G.
3. With 1 or possibly 2 shortenings, the vine can no longer be QQQ but my quick tests show no variation between this vine and Appreciation. Moreover, the vine should be shorter by 2 genes and tests do not show this either. It looks like it grew 2 genes UNLESS Appreciation is not correctly represented or the Elongation rules don't follow.

Rania said that using Nuts was like Christmas... to me it's looking more like Halloween.